Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Debt sustainability in Mexico: analysis of the budget constraint and fiscal reaction function

Abstract

This paper examines the sustainability of Mexico’s public debt by analyzing the government’s intertemporal budget constraint over the 2000–2024 period. Unit root tests, accounting for structural changes in trend and intercept, are employed to assess the stationarity of debt and its fiscal determinants. Additionally, an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model is estimated to characterize the government’s fiscal reaction function. The results indicate that while revenues, expenditures, and the primary balance are stationary under structural shifts, public debt remains non-stationary, violating key intertemporal sustainability conditions. Furthermore, the primary balance responds negatively to increases in debt, signaling the absence of corrective fiscal mechanisms. The study concludes that Mexico’s fiscal position during the analyzed period fails to meet sustainability criteria, providing empirical evidence to inform debates on financial risks and the urgent need to strengthen fiscal responsibility frameworks.

Keywords

public debt, revenues, expenditures, primary balance, budget constraint

PDF (Spanish)

References

  1. Albentosa, M. A. P., & Martí, A. M. R. (2016). Análisis de la sostenibilidad de la deuda pública en España. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 22(2), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v22i2.24856
  2. Alhaji Jibrilla, A. (2016). Fiscal sustainability in the presence of structural breaks: Does overconfidence on resource exports hurt government’s ability to finance debt? Evidence from Nigeria. Cogent Economics & Finance, 4(1), 1170317. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1170317
  3. Bozoklu, Ş., & Yılancı, V. (2014). Current account sustainability in emerging markets: An analysis with linear and nonlinear panel unit root tests. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(4), 251–264.
  4. Brady, G. L., & Magazzino, C. (2018). Fiscal sustainability in the EU. Atlantic Economic Journal, 46, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-018-9588-4
  5. Bravo, A. B. S., & Silvestre, A. L. (2002). Intertemporal sustainability of fiscal policies: Some tests for European countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00103-9
  6. Campo-Robledo, J., & Melo-Velandia, L. F. (2015). Sustainability of Latin American fiscal deficits: A panel data approach. Empirical Economics, 49(3), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0905-8
  7. Catalán, H. (2013). Función de reacción fiscal en México: Un análisis de cambio estructural. Investigación Económica, 72(286), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1667(13)72604-3
  8. Cedillo, E. R., & Herrera, F. L. (2016). La relación de los ingresos y gastos en el nivel subnacional en México: 1989–2014. Paradigma Económico, 8(2), 111–138.
  9. Clavères, G. (2023). Interest rates, growth and public debt sustainability (Trésor-Economics Working Paper No. 334). Direction générale du Trésor. https://www.tresor.economie.gouv.fr/Articles/ec72ac87-7440-4257-83a8-4d44f487670e/files/4dabec3d-3f1f-4775-a3e8-3c3a91b6c2d2
  10. Esquivel, G. (2020). Los impactos económicos de la pandemia en México [Nota]. Banco de México. https://www.banxico.org.mx/publicaciones-y-prensa/articulos-y-otras-publicaciones/%7BD442A596-6F43-D1B5-6686-64A2CF2F371B%7D.pdf
  11. Fondo Monetario Internacional. (2021, octubre). Fiscal monitor database of country fiscal measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Fiscal-Policies-Database-in-Response-to-COVID-19
  12. Fondo Monetario Internacional. (2023, 25 de julio). Government finance statistics. https://data.imf.org/?sk=a0867067-d23c-4ebc-ad23-d3b015045405
  13. Foncerrada, L. (2005). Public debt sustainability: Notes on debt sustainability, development of a domestic government securities market and financial risks. Análisis Económico, 20(44), 259–272.
  14. Gaspar, V. (2022). Un delicado equilibrio. Finanzas y Desarrollo, 4–8. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/Fandd/Article/2022/March/SP/gaspar.ashx
  15. Glynn, J., Perera, N., & Verma, R. (2007). Unit root tests and structural breaks: A survey with applications. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2331/233117245004.pdf
  16. Goktas, O., & Hepsag, A. (2015). The analysis of external debt sustainability by periodic unit root test with structural break: The case of Turkey. Research in Applied Economics, 7(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5296/rae.v7i4.8123
  17. Gujarati, D. N. (1998). Econometría. McGraw-Hill.
  18. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2020, 26 de agosto). Comunicado de prensa núm. 407/20. https://www.inegi.org.mx
  19. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2023, 18 de julio). Banco de información económica. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/indicadores/?tm=0#D493913
  20. Khan, A., & Murova, O. (2024). Is the rising US debt sustainable: An analysis of primary balance, economic growth, and real interest rate. Public Budgeting & Finance, 45(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12386
  21. Lau, E. B., & Soon, S. V. (2013). The behavior of external debt in Asian countries: Evidence based on panel unit root tests. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(1), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.720589
  22. Leith, C., & Wren-Lewis, S. (2013). Fiscal sustainability in a New Keynesian model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(8), 1477–1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12060
  23. Liu, Q., Cui, B., & Luo, C. (2022). A study on the fiscal sustainability of China’s provinces. Sustainability, 14(23), 15678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315678
  24. Londoño Espinosa, S., Reza Paocarina, É. B., León Serrano, L. A., & Morales Noriega, A. M. (2021). La sostenibilidad del endeudamiento público en Ecuador: Una visión de mediano plazo. Podium, (40), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.31095/podium.2021.40.4
  25. Magazzino, C. (2022). Fiscal sustainability in the GCC countries. International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 16(2), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42495-022-00082-9
  26. Mahmood, H. (2019). Testing fiscal sustainability hypothesis for Pakistan. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(2), 1175–1188.
  27. Marimuthu, M., Khan, H., & Bangash, R. (2021). Fiscal causal hypotheses and panel cointegration analysis for sustainable economic growth in ASEAN. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb
  28. Muzenda, A. (2014). An empirical assessment of fiscal sustainability in South Africa. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(23), 1–6.
  29. Quintos, C. E. (1995). Sustainability of the deficit process with structural shifts. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(4), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1392386
  30. Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. (2008). Informes sobre la situación económica, las finanzas públicas y la deuda pública: Cuarto trimestre de 2008. https://www.finanzaspublicas.hacienda.gob.mx/work/models/Finanzas_Publicas/docs/congreso/infotrim/2008/ivt/01inf/itinfp_200804.pdf
  31. Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. (2016). Informes sobre la situación económica, las finanzas públicas y la deuda pública: Cuarto trimestre de 2016. https://www.finanzaspublicas.hacienda.gob.mx/work/models/Finanzas_Publicas/docs/congreso/infotrim/2014/ivt/01inf/itinfp_201404.pdf
  32. Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. (2017). Informes sobre la situación económica, las finanzas públicas y la deuda pública: Tercer trimestre de 2017. https://www.finanzaspublicas.hacienda.gob.mx/work/models/Finanzas_Publicas/docs/congreso/infotrim/2017/iiit/01inf/itinfp_201703.pdf
  33. Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. (2023). Estadísticas oportunas de finanzas públicas. https://presto.hacienda.gob.mx/EstoporLayout/
  34. Shastri, S., Giri, A. K., & Mohapatra, G. (2017). An empirical assessment of fiscal sustainability for selected South Asian economies. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 24(1/610), 163–178.
  35. Zivot, E., & Andrews, K. (1992). Further evidence on the Great Crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/1391541

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)